论文部分内容阅读
以供应商管理库存和第三方物流为背景,对第三方物流提供商、供应商和制造商在内的VMI&TPL供应链进行博弈分析,指出分散决策下参与者利益冲突会降低供应链效率。为提高分散决策下供应链的效率,提出基于分散决策的两方(第三方物流提供商&供应商或供应商&制造商)收益共享机制和三方收益共享机制。研究结果表明,相对于不存在收益共享的分散式供应链,采用两方收益共享机制可以提高供应链效率和所有参与者的利润;在两方收益共享机制中,制造商或第三方物流提供商在不参与两方收益共享机制时的利润更高,意味着不合作可能是更优选择;在三方收益共享机制中,为提高供应链总利润,第三方物流提供商在分散决策阶段将选择低于其成本的服务价格;尽管相对两方收益共享机制下的供应链效率更高,但三方收益共享机制仅当所有参与者讨价还价能力足够大时才会被采用。
In the background of supplier management inventory and third-party logistics, the game analysis of VMI & TPL supply chain, including the third-party logistics providers, suppliers and manufacturers, points out that conflicts of interest among participants under decentralized decision will reduce supply chain efficiency. To improve the efficiency of supply chain under decentralized decision-making, this paper proposes a revenue sharing mechanism and a tripartite revenue sharing mechanism based on decentralized decision-making between the two parties (third-party logistics providers & suppliers or suppliers & manufacturers). The results show that, compared with the decentralized supply chain without revenue sharing, the two-way revenue sharing mechanism can improve the supply chain efficiency and the profits of all the participants. In the two-share revenue sharing mechanism, the manufacturer or third-party logistics provider In the three-way revenue sharing mechanism, in order to increase the total profit of the supply chain, the third-party logistics provider will choose low in the decentralized decision-making stage The service price at its cost; and although the supply chain is more efficient under the revenue sharing mechanism of both parties, the tripartite revenue sharing mechanism will only be adopted when the bargaining power of all participants is large enough.