论文部分内容阅读
目的:本文主要对小儿上呼吸道感染患儿的鉴别之中应用CRP以及SAA的诊断价值。方法:选2015年05月份到2017年05月份的小儿上呼吸道感染患儿100例,按照患儿的病情进行分组,其中43例患儿为病毒感染(病毒组),48例为细菌感染(细菌组),9例为混合感染(混合组),并选择同期50例健康儿童(健康组),全部小儿都采取免疫散射比浊法进行CRP、SAA水平检测,将结果进行对比分析。结果:健康组儿童的CRP、SAA水平均显著低于细菌组、混合组以及病毒组,而病毒组的CRP、SAA水平又显著低于细菌组,将数据与数据进行对比,数据之间存在较大的差距(P<0.05)。病毒组和健康组的CRP水平之间进行对比分析,(P>0.05)。结论:在小儿上呼吸道感染患儿诊断之中应用CRP和SAA联合检测,能够有效的诊断出细菌感染和病毒感染之间的差别,这能够为临床治疗提供科学参考,值得应用。
Objective: This article mainly on the diagnosis of children with upper respiratory tract infection in the application of CRP and SAA diagnostic value. Methods: From May 2015 to May 2017, 100 children with upper respiratory tract infection in children were enrolled and divided into groups according to their illness. Among them, 43 children were infected with virus (virus group) and 48 were bacterial infection (Mixed group) and 50 healthy children (healthy group) in the same period. All children were examined by immune nephelometry for CRP and SAA levels. The results were compared and analyzed. Results: The levels of CRP and SAA in healthy children were significantly lower than those in bacterial group, mixed group and virus group, while the levels of CRP and SAA in virus group were significantly lower than those in bacterial group. Comparing the data with the data, Big difference (P <0.05). The CRP levels of the virus group and the healthy group were compared (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Combined detection of CRP and SAA in the diagnosis of pediatric children with upper respiratory tract infection can effectively diagnose the difference between bacterial infection and viral infection, which can provide scientific reference for clinical treatment and is worthy of application.