论文部分内容阅读
科学的研究是建立在对大量客观事实进行比较、概括和分析的基础上的。通过比较发现异和同，然后研究其原因，这是科学研究的一般方法。历史研究也是如此。所谓比较研究，并不是历史研究的特殊方法。在历史研究的领域里其特殊性在于比较研究的范围。使用的方法，用通俗的名称叫十字座标法。在研究一个历史事件或一个历史人物时，以事件或人物为中心，以空间为经，以时间为纬，进行逐步扩展的比较研究。在同一时代，人们发现真理具有相对性，即使是敌对的政派往往都掌握一部分真理，胜利的派系所掌握的真理，也只是相对地优胜而已。不同派系的人所掌握的真理是互补的。就历史事件或人物的客观历史作用的功过是非而言，也具有相对性，有其功必有其过，有其过必有其功。相反相成，相辅相成。因此，应该对历史的前进运动进行具体的分析，避免绝对化。
Scientific research is based on a large number of objective facts to compare, summarize and analyze the basis. By comparing the differences found in the same, and then study the reasons for this is the general method of scientific research. The same is true of historical research. The so-called comparative study is not a special method of historical research. In the field of historical research its particularity lies in the comparative study. The method used, the popular name is the cross coordinate method. In the study of a historical event or a historical figure, we take a comparative study of events or figures as the center, space as the basis and time as the latitude for the gradual expansion. In the same era, people found that the truth has relativity. Even the hostile political parties tend to grasp a part of the truth, and the truth possessed by the victorious faction is only relatively superior. The truths held by the different factions are complementary. The merits of historical events or the historical objective of characters are both non-existent and relativistic. Conversely, complement each other. Therefore, we should make a concrete analysis of the progressive movement of history and avoid absoluteness.