“参与不干预”的提法不准确

• 出 处: 思想政治工作研究
• 发表日期: 1989年03期
• 关键词: 重大原则问题 职能范围

对如何实行保证监督,有一种说法叫“参与不干预”。我们认为,这种把参与和干预割裂开来的观点是不正确的。从辩证法的观点看,参与寓于干预,干预也包含参与,只是两者的表现形式不同。从某种意义上讲,监督也是一种干预的形式。如果用参与不干预的观点来解释保证和监督的关系,岂不也可以理解为“保证不监督”了吗?所以说,

There is a saying on how to carry out assurance supervision, “participation in non-intervention”. We think that this view of dividing participation and interference is not correct. From a dialectical point of view, participatory interposition, intervention also involves participation, but the two manifestations are different. In a sense, supervision is also a form of intervention. If we explain the relationship between guarantee and supervision by the perspective of participation in non-intervention, can we not understand it as “guaranteeing non-supervision”? Therefore,