论文部分内容阅读
疯狂制造战争危机的美帝国主义,越来越陷于失败的深渊了。在军事上,她的泥足深深埋入侵略朝鲜的战争中;在政治上,她公然拒绝和平解决朝鲜问题,决心扩大侵略行动,与全世界人民为敌,而自陷于完全孤立的地位。在它阵营的内部方面,美帝国主义扶持了联合国,迫使其仆从国家充当砲灰,企图建立侵略的联军。但由于仆从国家自顾不暇的危机,由于这些国家与美帝国主义无可避免的矛盾,这『侵略的联军』却并不能顺利地建立起来。而且,随着美帝在朝鲜的节节失败,以及美帝因疯狂企图扩大侵略行动而加于这些国家的压力的日益增强,帝国主义阵营内部的分歧和矛盾,也在日益增加中。艾奇逊之流表面上尽管吹牛说着什么『一致』『团结以赴』的话,但却掩盖不了这活生生的事实。小宜和墨卿先生两文,细密地概要地分析了最近帝国主义阵营内部分歧或矛盾的发展,材料充实,对于我们瞭解目前国际形势是有帮助的。这两篇文章虽有局部重复之感,但却可以互为补充。自然,我们在考察国际现势的时候,过高估计帝国主义阵营内部矛盾的重要性是有害的,我们必须记住,他们不但没有(?)掉而且正在追求同一的目的——加强反对民主和平的阵营。不过也不愿忽视,这些矛盾是存在的,而且势必继续加强,这种矛盾过去并不曾将他们从失败中救出来,而且将来也不能把他们从失败中救出来。——编者
U.S. imperialism, which crazed the crisis of war, has become increasingly caught up in the abyss of defeat. In the military, her mud foot was deeply embedded in the war that invaded North Korea. In politics, she publicly rejected refusal to peacefully resolve the DPRK issue and was determined to expand its aggressive operations and oppose the people of the world, leaving itself completely isolated. As for the internal aspects of its camp, the U.S. imperialists have supported the United Nations, forcing its servants to use their country as a cannon fodder in an attempt to establish an invading coalition. However, due to the overcrowded crisis in the slave countries, the “invading coalition forces” can not be successfully established because of the inevitable contradictions between these countries and US imperialism. Moreover, as the U.S. imperialism failed in North Korea and the pressure on the United States and Great Britain to add to these countries because of its insane attempt to expand its aggression, the disagreement and contradictions within the imperialist camp are also on the rise. While Acheson’s seemingly braggingheaded words of “unanimity” and “unite with others,” it can not hide the fact that this life is alive. Both Xiaoyi and Mohist Ching carefully analyzed the development of disagreements or contradictions within the recent imperialist camp in a detailed and detailed manner, which is informative and helpful for us to understand the current international situation. Although these two articles have the feeling of partial repetition, they can complement each other. Naturally, while examining the current international situation, it is detrimental to overestimate the importance of contradictions within the imperialist camp. We must remember that they are not only not going away and pursuing the same goal of strengthening opposition to democratic peace camp. However, they also refuse to ignore that these contradictions exist and are bound to continue to strengthen. Such contradictions have not rescued them from failure and will not save them from failure in the future. --editor