论文部分内容阅读
20世纪80年代的中国考古学被外国同行誉为进入了一个黄金时代。但是,如果认真思考一下,当前中国考古学的总体研究水平是否不负于这个盛名,却不免引出许多迷茫。为此,许多研究者,特别是许多年轻人纷纷检讨起中国考古学的现状,提出意见,并试图设计一张未来的蓝图。在诸多不满之中,类型学似乎是众矢之的。学术刊物中充满枯燥无味的分型定式的论文,这类文章不要说门外人看不懂,就连考古工作者自己也不耐烦看。更糟的是,这种毫无生气的研究居然被一些人看成唯一的目的。考古学发展
Chinese archeology of the 1980s was hailed by foreign colleagues as entering a golden age. However, if you think hard about whether the current overall level of Chinese archeology does not bear the reputation of this, it inevitably leads to a lot of confusion. To this end, many researchers, especially many young people, have reviewed the status quo of Chinese archeology, put forward their opinions and tried to design a blueprint for the future. Among many dissatisfactions, typology seems to be the target of criticism. Academic journals full of boring typesetting papers, such articles do not say outsiders can not read, and even archaeologists themselves impatient to see. To make matters worse, this lifeless study is actually regarded by some as the sole purpose. Archeology development