论文部分内容阅读
本刊今年第3期围绕“大数据与社会学研究方法”组织刊发了4篇文章,从不同立场和角度探讨了大数据在社会学中的应用问题,引起学术界的广泛关注和热烈讨论。刘林平教授等人特地撰文,对其中潘绥铭教授的文章观点提出质疑。为了推动相关讨论不断走向深入,本期特刊发这篇质疑文章,并同时刊发潘绥铭教授的回应。学术争论是推动学术进步的基本动力,然而长期以来,国内学术界较少见到公开的学术批评,不利于学术的积累与发展。本期刊发的两篇争鸣文章,直面问题,针锋相对,体现了作者对学术的坦诚和执着,相信会进一步加深大家对大数据性质的了解。
This issue of the third issue of this year around the “big data and sociology research methods ” organization published 4 articles, from different perspectives and perspectives on the application of big data in sociology, causing widespread concern in academia and Lively discussion. Professor Liu Linping and others specifically wrote an article on which Professor Pan Suiming’s article points of view. In order to further deepen the relevant discussions, this special issue of this questioned article, with the simultaneous publication of Professor Pan Suiming’s response. Academic controversy is the basic motivation for promoting academic progress. However, academic circles in the Mainland have seldom seen public academic criticism for a long time, which is not conducive to the accumulation and development of academic research. The two articles published in this issue face the problem confront each other, reflecting the author’s frankness and dedication to the academic, I believe we will further deepen our understanding of the nature of big data.