论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨中西医结合护理干预对围术期胆结石患者临床效果。方法选自我院于2015年6月—2016年6月期间收治的胆结石患者200例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组100例和对照组100例。对照组采用常规干预,观察组采用中西医结合干预。比较两组干预总满意度、排气时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、术后并发症、住院时间,及干预前后舒适度评分变化。结果观察组干预总满意率(98.00%)高于对照组(81.00%),且有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组排气时间和肠鸣音恢复时间快于对照组,术后并发症低于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,且均有统计学差异(P<0.05);两组患者干预后舒适度评分增加,且有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组患者干预后舒适度评分高于对照组,且有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合护理干预对围术期胆结石患者临床效果明显,具有重要研究意义。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine on patients with perioperative gallstones. Methods 200 cases of gallstone patients admitted to our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were divided into observation group (n = 100) and control group (n = 100) according to random number table. Control group using conventional intervention, the observation group using Integrative Medicine intervention. The total satisfaction degree, exhaust time, bowel sounds recovery time, postoperative complications, length of stay, and changes in comfort scores before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The total satisfaction rate (98.00%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.00%) (P <0.05), and the exhaust time and bowel sounds recovery time in the observation group were faster than those in the control group (P <0.05). The comfort scores of both groups increased after intervention (P <0.05), while those in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group Post-comfort score higher than the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion Integrative Chinese and Western medicine intervention in patients with perioperative gallstones clinical effect is obvious, has important research significance.