论文部分内容阅读
2003年,甲A即将走到“尽头”的一年。“中超”之于甲A诸队的诱惑显然远胜于一只“烤乳猪”对饿汉的吸引力。因为在中超的蓝图中,“中超”的头衔不仅意味着一支球队在中国足坛的地位,还可以让俱乐部和赢利基本划上一个“=”。尽管一切都是未知,但诱惑确是结结实实存在的。 在这种背景下,甲A赛场上的裁判们登场了。别管着黑衣、红衣还是黄衣,所承受的压力和关注都应该是空前的。在甲A第一阶段的全部6轮比赛中,裁判的整体表现令人满意,尽管操着不同口音的“黑哨”声每轮依然会在各赛区响起,但不能排除“架秧子起哄”的嫌疑。这其中,真正具有争议的判罚只有两场。
In 2003, A is about to reach the end of the year. The temptation of “super” in the A group is obviously far better than the attraction of a “roasted suckling pig” to the hungry. Because in the blueprint for Super League, “Super” title not only means that a team’s position in the Chinese football, but also make the club and the profit basic draw a “=”. Although everything is unknown, but the temptation is indeed solid. In this context, the judges on the A A stadium debut. Regardless of the black, red or yellow, the pressure and attention should be unprecedented. The overall performance of the referee was satisfactory in all six rounds of the first phase of Division A. Despite the “black whistle” sounds of different accents each ring will still ring in each race area, but can not rule out the suspicion of “racking” . Among these, there are only two really disputed fines.