论文部分内容阅读
傅玉的相关研究将汉语论元类截省界定为移位截省,并认为“是什么”“是谁”为含pro的假截省。本研究从调查和论证层面认为:傅的相关界定不符合汉语句法事实,pro假截省的设定违背了pro的相关句法属性。汉语截省结构的语义句法属性是:论元类截省由非定指DP焦点询问截省而来;非论元类截省由添加焦点询问截省而来。“是什么”和“是谁”也是截省结构,只有“是什么”中焦点标记语“是”为必须,因为名词指称“什么”不含焦点信息,不能实现焦点询问。本研究还探讨了傅文非论元类截省辖域解读句法推导的相关问题。
The related research of Fu Yu defines the Chinese argument metaclass province as the shift province, and considers “what ” “who ” as the false province containing pro. From the investigation and argumentation level, this study thinks that the related definition of Fu does not accord with the fact of Chinese syntax, and the setting of pro false intercept province violates the relevant syntactical attribute of pro. The semantic syntactic properties of the Chinese intercepting structure are as follows: the intercepting metaclass is intercepted by the interrogation of the nondefinite DP; the intercepting of the metaclass derives from intercepting the interrogating focus. “Is ” and “who ” is the cut-off structure, only “what ” in the focus markup “is ” is necessary because the noun refers to “what ” does not contain the focus information, Can not achieve the focus of inquiry. This study also explores the related problems of Fu Wen-fei’s metacommandration of metacomprehensive jurisdictions.