论文部分内容阅读
农民工索取劳务报酬案件快审快结因劳务合同纠纷,王卫中等34名农民工将转包方某装饰公司、包工头阮某诉至朝阳区法院,要求支付劳务报酬共计34万余元。朝阳区法院经过审理认为双方纠纷系建设施工合同层层转包形成的农民工劳务报酬纠纷,本案中的转包行为违反法律规定,为非法转包;根据查明的事实,某装饰公司及阮某尚欠农民工劳务报酬20万元。因34名农民工主张的劳务报酬总额已超过20万元,故朝阳区法院判决某装饰公司及阮某在20万元范围内,连带支付34名农民工的劳务报酬。一审判决后,某装饰公司及阮某不服,上诉至该院。
Due to disputes over labor contracts, 34 migrant workers from Wang Weizhong will subcontract a decoration company and contract worker Nguyen Ruan sued Chaoyang District Court for a total remuneration of 340,000 yuan. Chaoyang District Court held that the dispute between the two sides of the construction contract is the formation of sub-contract labor migrant labor disputes, the case of subcontracted in violation of the law, illegal subcontracting; based on the facts found, a decoration company and Nguyen Some owed migrant workers remuneration 200,000 yuan. Because 34 migrant workers claimed that the total remuneration for services exceeded 200,000 yuan, Chaoyang District Court ruled that a decoration company and Nguyen Muan paid the labor remuneration of 34 migrant workers jointly and severally within the scope of 200,000 yuan. After the first instance verdict, a decoration company and Nguyen refused to accept the appeal to the hospital.