论文部分内容阅读
张平子《二京赋》乃《文选》中经典篇章,古来注家颇多,如晁矫、武巽、薛综等。李善为《二京赋》作注,就是在薛综注基础上进行。李善云:旧注是者,因而留之,并于篇首题其姓名。其有乖缪,臣乃具释,并称“臣善”以别之,他皆类此。~①今存各系统的《文选》都保存了薛综注,然而时间久远,其中究竟有多少保存了薛综注原貌实在不敢妄下断语。何焯云:薛综注,此注谓出于薛综,疑其假托。综是赤乌六年卒,安得见王肃《易注》而引用之耶?《综传》有述《二京解》之语,恐亦不谓此赋也。又孙叔然始造反切,未必遂行于吴。~②何焯大胆提出薛综注是伪托,理由有二,一是王肃在薛综之后,薛综注不当引王书;二是孙叔然和薛综同时,薛综不及用孙所造的反切。何说考虑到了引书
Zhang Pingzi “two Beijing Fu” is “classic” in the “anthologies”, a lot of bets in the past, such as Chao Jiao, Wu Zhi, Xue comprehensive. Li Shan as “two Beijing Fu” for the note, is based on the Xue comprehensive note on. Lishan Yun: old note is the person, so stay, and in the title of the first chapter of his name. His obedient, minister is a release, saying “Chen Shan ” In addition, he is all this class. ~ ① save the system of “anthologies” have saved Xue comprehensive note, but over time, which exactly how much saved the original look of Xue Zhangtun really dare not jump off. Ho Cheuk-yun: Xue comprehensive note, this note is out of Xue comprehensive, suspect its false care. Comprehensive is Chiwu six-year-old died, Andrew saw Wang Su “easy to note” and quoted the Lord? “Comprehensive Biography” describes the “Beijing solution” in the language, fear does not mean that Fu also. And Sun Shuran started counter-cutting, may not be in Wu. ~ ② He Zhuo boldly proposed Xue Zhangtan is a false care, there are two reasons, one Wang Su Su Xue after Xue Zuyin improperly cited Wang book; Second, Sun Shuran and Xue together at the same time, . He said that taking into account the quotations