论文部分内容阅读
2002年4月,海南某拍卖行接受当地一法院委托拍卖三亚市一块面积为10亩的土地使用权。按照当时法院提供的估价报告,标的评估价为245万元。按当地法院委托拍卖贯例,法院在《拍卖委托书》上并未注明标的拍卖保留价,而是有“拍卖保留价见评估报告”这么一条。拍卖行当时拍卖该标的土地使用权时,就直接在拍卖公告上标注了标的参考价245万元。当时,由于正值当地房地产开发市场的冰冻期,虽然拍卖行经多方努力推销该标的,但终因当时标的定价过高
April 2002, an auction house in Hainan to accept a local court commissioned auction Sanya City, an area of 10 acres of land use rights. According to the valuation report provided by the court at that time, the subject evaluation price was 2.45 million yuan. According to the local courts entrusted auction case, the court did not specify the auction reserve price in the “auction power of attorney”, but “auction reserve price, see the assessment report” so one. The auction house auctioned the subject of the land use right, the auction notice directly marked the subject of the reference price of 2.45 million yuan. At that time, due to the freezing period of the local real estate development market, although the auction house tried its best to promote the target, the final target price was too high