包豪斯悖论:一份被撤销的宣言

• 作 者: 周诗岩 Nick Stember
• 机 构: 复旦大学,中国美术学院艺术人文学院,
• 出 处: 艺术界
• 发表日期: 2016年06期
• 关键词: 包豪斯 Bauhaus 表现主义 莱默 艺术团体 执笔者 planned itself completed bringing

如果谈及对于达达的回应,包豪斯在1923年的宣言中唯一具体提及的艺术团体就是达达。其中一个版本的执笔者奥斯卡施莱默把达达作为对表现主义的一种扬弃和逆转。而在对资本权力和资本主义价值观的态度上,施莱默和表现主义、达达一样,持否定的立场,但同时,包豪斯的未来被设想为对这两种否定方式的吸收和超越,“热爱最遥远的过去一如热爱最遥远的未来;拒绝反动一如拒绝无政府主义”。

When it comes to responding to Dada, the only Bauhaus group specifically mentioned in the 1923 Declaration is Dada. One of the editions of the author, Oskar Schremer, uses Dada as a sublation and reversal of expressionism. In the attitude of capitalist values ​​and capitalist values, Schremer held the same negative attitude as expressionism and Dada, but at the same time, the future of Bauhaus was envisaged as an absorption and transcendence of these two forms of negation “Love the furthest past as love the furthest future; refuse reactionary rejection of anarchism, for example.”