张国焘机会主义和“偏师”说的破产

• 作 者: 张廷贵
• 机 构: 军事科学院计划指导部学术调研室,
• 出 处: 党史资料与研究
• 发表日期: 1985年05期
• 关键词: 鄂豫皖边区 反“围剿” 中央局 地方武装建设 革命形势 苏维埃运动 游击战争 苏家埠战役 少共国际 白区工作

1932年秋,中国工农红军第四方面军没有打破敌人第四次“围剿”,遭致失败,被迫撤离鄂豫皖革命根据地。这是张国焘的机会主义错误所造成的结果。对这次失败,毛泽东同志作了精辟的分析,指出:“在鄂豫皖边区根据地则有所谓‘偏师’说,那里的一些领导同志认为第三次‘围剿’失败后国民党不过是偏师了,要进攻红军,就得由帝国主义亲自出马担当主力军。”“这个‘左’倾机会主义,种下了鄂豫皖边区反对第四次‘围剿’……斗争中的错误路线的根苗,使红军在敌人的严重的‘围剿’面前不得不处于无能的地位,给了中国革命以很大的损失。”这次失败的原因和教训,总的是

In the autumn of 1932, the Fourth Front Army of the Chinese Workers and Peasants’ Red Army failed to break the enemy’s fourth “encirclement and suppression” campaign and was forced to withdraw from the revolutionary base areas of Hubei, Henan and Anhui. This is the result of the erroneous opportunism of Zhang Guotao. Comrade Mao Zedong made an incisive analysis of this defeat and pointed out: “There are so-called ’devoted divisions’ in the base areas of the border areas of Hubei, Henan and Anhui provinces. Some leading comrades there think that the Kuomintang was merely a partial teacher after the failure of the third ’encirclement and suppression’ If we want to attack the Red Army, we must personally run by the imperialists as the main force. ”“ This ’Left’ opportunist planted the root and seed of the erroneous line in the struggle against the fourth encirclement and suppression by the border areas of Hubei, Henan and Anhui provinces. The Red Army had to be incompetent in the face of the enemy’s serious ”encirclement and suppression“ and gave great losses to the Chinese revolution. ”The reasons and lessons of this failure are generally