论文部分内容阅读
网络上有种观点认为,南海仲裁案最终裁决结果之所以对中国不利,在一定程度上与中国不参与案件审理有关,中国政府在此期间的不参与决策欠妥。这一观点导致学生对南海仲裁案产生许多误解和疑惑。思想政治教师必须解疑释惑、正本清源,对错误论调给予正面回应,以帮助学生正确认识南海仲裁案。一、原因维度1996年,我国加入《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)。从原则上看,我们应参加相关审理。但是,中国自始至终没有参与
There is a view on the internet that the reason for the final ruling of the arbitration in South China Sea is unfavorable to China and to some extent related to China’s failure to participate in the hearing of the case. The Chinese government did not participate in the decision-making process during this period. This view led to many misunderstandings and doubts about the South China Sea arbitration case. Ideological and political teachers must interpret the doubts, the original source, to correct the wrong tone to give a positive response to help students correctly understand the South China Sea arbitration case. First, the reason dimensions In 1996, China acceded to the “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”). In principle, we should participate in the relevant trials. However, China has not participated from beginning to end