论文部分内容阅读
实务中对于患者死亡但不构成医疗事故的医疗损害赔偿案件的精神损害抚慰金部分存在很大的分歧,其不仅存在于医患双方争执的焦点中,不同法官对精神损害抚慰金的最终判决也存在显著的差异,是否应当判决精神损害抚慰金,按照何种标准进行裁判等分歧很大程度上源于法律法规自身的缺陷,如何解决分歧,是解决医患纠纷的当务之急。
Practice for the patient’s death but does not constitute a medical malpractice damages cases of mental damage to the solatium part of the existence of a great deal of differences, which not only exist in the focus of the dispute between doctors and patients, different judges on mental damage to the ultimate decision of solatium There are notable differences. Whether the mental damage should be adjudged or not depends on the criteria such as refereeing. The divergence stems largely from the defects of laws and regulations. How to resolve the differences is the most urgent task to solve the disputes between doctors and patients.