论文部分内容阅读
为纪念世界反法西斯战争暨中国抗日战争胜利65周年,中国社会科学院于2010年9月4日至5日在北京主办了中国社会科学论坛(2010年.世界史)“二战后东亚与欧洲历史反思与和解进程比较”国际学术研讨会。会议由中国社会科学院世界历史研究所承办,中国德国史研究会、德国汉斯.赛德尔基金会与中国日本史学会协办。来自中国、朝鲜、韩国、日本、越南、美国、俄罗斯、德国、法国、波兰、匈牙利、捷克12个国家的70多位学者参加了会议。与会学者们就二战后德国与日本对本国侵略历史的态度、东亚与欧洲和解进程的差异及其原因展开了热烈的讨论,并就如何汲取战后欧洲国家反思与和解的积极经验,推动日本的历史反思与东亚的和解进程提出了许多富有建设性的意见。本期的“圆桌会议”栏目选择了四位与会学者的发言在这里刊登。宋志勇的文章从整体上对德国和日本战后历史反思的不同态度做了勾画;鲍尔康泊和依田3家的文章在一定程度上反映出这两个国家对其在二战中所犯罪行的反思程度;李薇的文章则从战后整个世界政治格局的宽阔视野、日本近代的思想文化和当前国际政治较量的角度,较为深入地分析了为什么日本不能正视自己所犯罪行的原因。通过这些文章的发表,我们希望能够推动这一专题的讨论与研究,有助于实现东亚的进一步和解。
To commemorate the 65th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War and the Anti-Japanese War in China, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences hosted the China Social Science Forum (2010 World History) in Beijing from September 4 to September 5, 2010. The History of East Asia and Europe after World War II Reflection and Reconciliation Process Comparison “International Symposium. The conference was hosted by the Institute of World History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China German History Research Association, German Hans Seidel Foundation and China Japan History Association. More than 70 scholars from China, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, the United States, Russia, Germany, France, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic attended the conference. The participating scholars engaged in heated discussions on the attitude of Germany and Japan to the history of aggression in China after the Second World War, the differences and reasons of the reconciliation process between East Asia and Europe, and promoted the positive experience of how to learn from the postwar European countries’ rehearsal and reconciliation. Historical reflection and the process of reconciliation in East Asia have put forward many constructive suggestions. This issue of ”round table" column selected four participants scholar’s speech published here. Song Zhiyong’s articles outline the different attitudes toward the post-war history of Germany and Japan as a whole. The articles by Baldorneng and Yitian, to a certain extent, reflect the fact that the two countries committed crimes against World War II The article from the perspective of post-war politics in the world, the modern Japanese ideology and culture and the current international political contest, analyzes the reasons why Japan can not face the crime it committed. Through the publication of these articles, we hope that discussions and studies on this topic will be promoted and that further reconciliation will be achieved in East Asia.