论文部分内容阅读
目的观察介入治疗在凶险性前置胎盘患者临床治疗中的应用价值。方法 78例凶险性前置胎盘患者,采用单双号法分成介入组和常规组,各39例。常规组患者采用常规手术方式治疗,介入组患者采用子宫动脉栓塞术介入治疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果介入组患者的手术时间、住院时间明显短于常规组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术中出血量明显少于常规组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后24、48 h疼痛评分均明显低于常规组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);介入组中并发症发生率为5.1%低于常规组的30.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用介入方法治疗凶险性前置胎盘患者具有痛苦小、疗效可靠、安全性高等优势,临床推广应用价值显著。
Objective To observe the value of interventional therapy in the clinical treatment of dangerous placenta previa. Methods A total of 78 patients with dangerous placenta previa were divided into intervention group and conventional group by single and double number method, with 39 cases in each group. The patients in the conventional group were treated by conventional surgery. The patients in the intervention group were treated by uterine artery embolization. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and hospitalization time of the intervention group were significantly shorter than those of the conventional group (P <0.05). The blood loss in the intervention group was significantly less than that in the conventional group (P <0.05). The pain scores at 24 h and 48 h after operation were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the intervention group was 5.1% lower than that in the conventional group (P <0.05), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The application of interventional therapy in the treatment of dangerous placenta previa has the advantages of small pain, reliable curative effect and high safety. The clinical application value is significant.