论文部分内容阅读
无论对“红学”或“鲁学”(鲁迅研究之学),我都是很尊敬的。这些年来,有些人对红学不大尊敬了,嫌它的很多考证大繁琐了,并有越来越繁琐之势。“新红学”一般指“五四”后的红学,大体上是以考证、思想、艺术三个方面作为研究对象的。说他们只搞繁琐考证,这是睁眼说瞎话。不说别的,以语言艺术而论,红楼梦就早已稳居顶峰的位置,以至所有语言辞典,凡白话文的例句,“五四”后就都着重引用红楼了(也兼及水浒及其他个别白话小说),红楼梦在语言艺术上的崇高地位,得到了公认。至于思想性问题,一般总以为这是马克思主义的专利,其实不对。红楼梦在“五四”后崇高的艺术地位,决不是单对语
Regardless of the “Red Learning” or “Lu learning” (Lu Xun studies), I am very respectful. In recent years, some people have not respected Hongxue for so many studies that it is too cumbersome and cumbersome. The New Learning School generally refers to the Red Learning after the May 4th Movement. Generally, it takes the research, ideology and art as the research objects. Say they only engage in cumbersome textual research, which is to say nothing. Not to say anything else, in terms of language art, the Dream of Red Mansions has long been at its peak, and even in all language dictionaries, examples of vernacular words have been quoted in the Red Mansions since the May 4th Movement (and also the Water Margin and other individual vernacular Novels), Hongloumeng in the sublime position of language art, has been recognized. As for ideological questions, it is generally wrong to think that this is a Marxist patent. Dream of Red Mansions in lofty art status after the May 4th Movement is by no means a single language