论文部分内容阅读
大凡一种科学成立之沿革,惟躬预其事者始克言之亲切有味,洞悉个中症结,更能体贴以往作家创始之艰难,权衡其作品影响后学之程度。惟所难者,则专家鲜有馀暇,追述其学问之渊源。而说学史者又未必於斯学有深切之研究,特殊之贡献;间或要未明,轻重失察,反多隔靴搔痒之论;浸至学史之作
Almost a kind of evolution of the founding of science, but bow before the beginning of Kham’s cordial, insight into the crux of the problem, the more able to pay attention to the difficulties of previous writers, weighing the extent of their work after school. However, those who are in difficulty, the experts rarely have spare time, chasing the source of their knowledge. The study of history, however, may not have a deep study on the Sri Lankan school, a special contribution; between or unspecified, the severity of oversight, anti-multiple boots itch;