论文部分内容阅读
Fillmore的“格语法”与“框架语义学”一直被视为句法语义领域的经典理论。国内已有一些学者详细介绍这两个理论,但理论与理论之间的过渡,以及对于理论本身的评论,相关的论文中却鲜有涉及。本文将承《从“格语法”到“框架语义学”的演变之梳理》一文的脉络框架,对格语法三个阶段的理论分别进行详细评论:从“格”本身的不可行性,到“格语法”第二阶段理论中的种种矛盾之处,再到“框架语义学”在传统语义解释方面的超越以及不足。本文也从另一个侧面展示了理论和理论之间的过渡演变。
Fillmore’s “Grammar” and “Frame Semantics” have always been regarded as classical theories in the field of syntax and semantics. Some scholars in China have introduced these two theories in detail, but the transition between theory and theory and the comments on the theory itself are rarely mentioned in related essays. In this paper, I will give a detailed review of the three stages of grammatical grammar respectively from the frame of “combing the evolution of frame semantics” from “” to “grammatical framework”: from “lattice” Infeasibility, the contradictions in the second stage theory of “grammatical grammar ” and the transcendence and insufficiency of “frame semantics ” in the traditional semantic interpretation. This article also shows the transitional evolution between theory and theory from another aspect.