论文部分内容阅读
案情黄某,山东省某企业高级工程师,2012年5月达到60周岁,当地社会保险部门为其办理退休手续时发现,按照黄某的档案记载,黄某抵顶养老保险缴费年限的参加工作时间为1961年12月,经推算,黄其参加工作时只有九岁,与事实有严重出入,为此社会保险部门展开了调查,最终在哈尔滨市某单位查到黄某的第一份档案,参加工作时间为1975年7月,为此当地社会保险部门办公会议决定,以第一份档案为依据为黄某办理退休手续,黄某对此不服,到当地政府和上级部门进行上访,
Case Hwang, Shandong Province, a company senior engineer, reached 60 years in May 2012, the local social insurance authorities for their retirement formalities found that, according to Hwang’s file records, Hwang pension payment age to participate in working hours In December 1961, it was estimated that Huang was only nine years old at the time of his work and had serious discrepancies with the facts. To this end, the social insurance department conducted a survey and finally found the first file of Hwang in a unit in Harbin to attend Working hours for July 1975, for the local social insurance office meeting decision, based on the first file for the Hwang for retirement procedures, Hwang refused to accept this appeal to the local government and higher authorities for petitions,