论文部分内容阅读
马克思主义中国化的历史经验表明,是依循实证科学解释原则还是依循历史唯物主义解释原则,不仅关系到能否坚持马克思主义的科学性和革命性相统一问题,而且直接关乎到中国特色社会主义的前途和命运。实证科学解释原则会遮蔽人的主体选择性和能动创造性即马克思主义的革命性,从而会削弱马克思主义意识形态话语权的主导作用;历史唯物主义解释原则能够贯彻马克思主义的严格的科学性(合规律性)和彻底的革命性(合目的性)相统一的价值原则,从而能够增强马克思主义意识形态话语权的主导作用。
The historical experience of the sinicization of Marxism shows that whether it follows the principle of empirical scientific explanation or the principle of historical materialism is not only related to the issue of whether we can adhere to the scientific and revolutionary unification of Marxism but also directly relates to the socialism with Chinese characteristics Future and destiny. The principles of positive scientific explanation will cover the main body of the people selective and creative initiative that is revolutionary Marxism, thus weakening the leading role of Marxist ideological discourse; historical materialist principles of interpretation can implement Marxist strict scientific Regularity and thorough revolutionary (purposefulness), so as to enhance the leading role of Marxist ideological discourse.