论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析传统保守治疗和手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效。方法:以2013年3月-2015年1月期间我院收治68例异位妊娠患者为对象进行分析,依照患者病情及意愿均分为手术组和保守组各34例,手术组采取腹腔镜手术治疗,保守组采用保守药物治疗。结果:手术组患者住院总时间明显比保守组短;手术组输卵管通畅率和宫内受孕成功率高于保守组,差异有统计学意义。结论:在针对异位妊娠治疗上,采用腹腔镜手术治疗可以显著缩短治疗时间,且患者治疗后宫内受孕成功率显著提高。临床上针对输卵管破裂患者多建议采取手术治疗,而对于早期未破裂患者则通常建议患者采取药物保守治疗。
Objective: To compare and analyze the traditional conservative treatment and surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: From March 2013 to January 2015, 68 cases of ectopic pregnancy treated in our hospital were analyzed. According to the patients’ condition and wishes, 34 cases were divided into operation group and conservative group respectively. The operation group received laparoscopic operation Treatment, conservative treatment with conservative drugs. Results: The total hospitalization time in operation group was shorter than that in conservative group. The success rate of tubal patency and intrauterine pregnancy in operation group was higher than that in conservative group. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: In the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, laparoscopic surgery can significantly shorten the treatment time, and the success rate of intrauterine pregnancy after treatment significantly increased. Surgery for tubal rupture in patients with more clinical recommendations, and for patients with early unruptured patients are usually advised to take conservative treatment of drugs.