论文部分内容阅读
我国传统民事法律规范对隐私权的保护主要是在隐私权与名誉权发生竞合时,通过对名誉权的保护进行“间接”保护。《侵权责任法》颁布以后,虽然首次明确了隐私权的法律地位,但隐私权的具体权利内容尚未从法律层面进行界定。如果侵犯个人信息隐私,但并未达侵犯名誉权的程度,应当如何认定呢?本文引用的司法判例确认了属于法律保护范围的个人信息属于隐私权的重要内容,合法取得他人信息的经营者,未经许可向第三人披露他人个人信息的可构成侵犯隐私权。商业银行是公民个人信息的高度集中领域,商业银行有必要加强客户信息保护,有效防控相关风险。
The protection of privacy right in China’s traditional civil law standards mainly protects the right of reputation through “indirect” protection when the right of privacy and reputation conflict. Although the legal status of privacy has been clarified for the first time after the Tort Liability Act was enacted, the content of the specific right of privacy has not been defined from the legal aspect. How to determine if the infringement of privacy of personal information does not reach the extent of infringement of reputation? The judicial precedent cited in this article confirms that the personal information belonging to the scope of legal protection is an important part of the right to privacy. Operators legally obtaining the information of others, The unauthorized disclosure of the personal information of others to a third party may constitute a violation of privacy. Commercial banks are highly concentrated areas of citizens’ personal information. Commercial banks need to strengthen customer information protection and effectively prevent and control related risks.