论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨国际矿业和金属理事会(ICMM)定性风险评价在职业病危害预评价工作的应用。方法分别采用ICMM法和类比法预测某项目职业病危害因素可能存在的风险,并对2种评价方法结果的一致性进行比较。结果类比法与ICMM法分别对有毒有害作业进行分级,其中一致的有4个岗位,不一致的有2个岗位,2种方法对有毒有害作业分级结果基本一致,但存在一定的差异。结论 ICMM定性风险评价在职业病危害预评价工作中有一定的应用价值,在类比法受到条件限制时,ICMM定性风险评价不失为一种有效的评价方法。
Objective To explore the application of ICMM qualitative risk assessment in the pre-evaluation of occupational disease hazards. Methods The ICMM method and the analogy method were used to predict the possible risks of occupational hazards in a project, and the consistency of the results of two evaluation methods was compared. Results Analogy and ICMM were classified into toxic and hazardous jobs respectively. Among them, 4 jobs were consistent and 2 jobs were inconsistent. The results of the two methods were basically the same as those of toxic and hazardous jobs, but there were some differences. Conclusion ICMM qualitative risk assessment has certain value in the pre-evaluation of occupational hazards. When the analogical approach is limited, the qualitative risk assessment of ICMM is an effective evaluation method.