论文部分内容阅读
目的 分析舒适护理对改善心内科住院患者负面情绪和心理障碍的效果.方法 2020年2月～2021年2月,本院共计收治78例心内科住院患者作为分析对象,依照摸球法将本研究分析对象分为对照组(n=39)和实验组(n=39),其中前者采取常规护理方法,后者则采取舒适护理方法.采取不同护理方法后,比较本研究两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、护理满意度及症状自评量表(SCL-90)评分结果.结果 干预后,两组患者的SAS评分、SDS评分均降低,且实验组SAS评分、SDS评分低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后,实验组护理满意度显著高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);入院时,两组SCL-90评分无显著差异,P＞0.05,出院时,实验组SCL-90评分显著优于对照组,P＜0.05.结论 心内科住院患者的舒适护理运用效果良好,可以显著改善患者负面情绪和心理障碍.“,”Objective To analyze the effect of comfort nursing on improving negative emotions and psychological disorders of inpatients in the department of cardiology. Methods From February 2020 to February 2021, 78 hospitalized patients in the Department of Cardiology in our hospital were taken as the analysis object, according to the touch ball method, the subjects were divided into the control group (n=39) and the experimental group (n=39). The former was treated with conventional nursing methods, while the latter was treated with comfortable nursing methods. After adopting different nursing methods, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, nursing satisfaction and symptom check list- 90 (SCL-90) score were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, SAS score and SDS score in 2 groups were decreased, and SAS score and SDS score in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05); after intervention, nursing satisfaction in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P＜0.05); at admission, there was no significant difference in SCL-90 scores between the two groups (P＞0.05), at discharge, the score of SCL-90 in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion The application of comfort nursing for inpatients in the department of cardiology has good effect, and can significantly improve the negative emotions and psychological disorders of patients.