论文部分内容阅读
关于民间有无元青花的讨论已进行到第四期了,这次系列讨论至此也临近了尾声。首先代表编辑部的全体同仁感谢全国各地及海外藏家的热心参与,面对众多来电来信,我们不可能一一刊登,只能依据版面情况选择刊发。鉴于本刊前面几期讨论文章中持否定意见的占了很大比例,本期将摘发两篇对济南研讨会研究成果持肯定意见的民间来稿,以期做到“公平、公正交流”。需要申明的是,我们开展这次系列讨论的目的,仅仅是为众多元青花爱好者提供了一个言论自由的平台,一次讨论并不可能解决所有问题。衷心希望专家和广大藏家们在日后的研究中,除了熟读文献资料外,能够结合更多的实物资料,采用更多的科学手段——那样,元青花之谜在国内被解开也就指日可待了。
The discussion on whether or not there is a blue and white flower in the private sector has been carried out till the fourth issue, so far this series of discussions is coming to an end. First of all, on behalf of the editorial department, all my colleagues thanked collectors from all over the country and overseas for their enthusiastic participation. In the face of a large number of incoming calls, we can not publish them one after another, and we can only choose to publish them according to the layout. In the light of the large negative percentage of opinion held in the previous articles in this issue, two non-governmental contributions with positive opinions on the research results of the Jinan Symposium will be sent in this issue with a view to achieving “fair and impartial exchanges.” What needs to be affirmed is that the purpose of this series of discussions is that we only provide a platform for freedom of speech and freedom for many blue-and-white fanciers. It can not solve all the problems through one discussion. I sincerely hope that experts and the collectors in their future studies will be able to combine more physical materials with more scientific means in addition to being familiar with the literature and materials - in that case, the mystery of Yuan and Qing Dynasties will be unlocked at home Just around the corner