论文部分内容阅读
针对本“学科”与“知识”危机而引发的知识形态研究,从根本上源于话语自觉。文艺学的知识形态,是作为文学艺术理论与批评实践的特定人文学科的理论观念体系与学科实践成果、社会行动效应的总称。其内涵同时包含知识谱系学、知识总体性、审美实践性和学科智慧风貌方面的规定性。知识形态问题域的设定,包含着主体认识论的深化、价值论的追寻,隐含着“行动意义的因果阐释”。文艺学知识形态与知识生产问题密不可分,知识生产决定了知识形态的整体面貌,而特定时期的知识形态也影响着知识生产的关系、惯习和生产环境,二者具有深刻的辩证关系。由此反思作为文学理论和文艺实践的科学,文艺学是一种审美经验的理性认知和感性实践的社会存在的历史化、地方化的学科。从根本上说是审美经验的理性呈现和历史性凝结、传承、深化,是具有历史化功能的审美存在的社会意识形态研究。在知识场域的社会化建构中,知识分子以历时性与共时性交织的智慧化活动,在文化空间变迁中呈现出历史(时间化)的美感。
The research on the forms of knowledge triggered by the crises of “subject” and “knowledge” fundamentally comes from the conscious discourse. The knowledge form of literature and art is the general concept of the theoretical concept system and the results of academic practice and social action as the particular humanities as the theory of literary art and critical practice. Its connotation contains both the pedigree of knowledge, the totality of knowledge, the aesthetic practice and the wisdom of disciplines. The setting of the problem domain of knowledge morphology includes the deepening of the epistemology of the subject and the pursuit of the value theory, implying “the causal interpretation of the meaning of the action ”. The knowledge form of literature and art is inextricably linked with knowledge production. Knowledge production determines the overall appearance of knowledge form, and the knowledge form in a specific period also influences the relationship between knowledge production, habitual habit and production environment. Both of them have profound dialectical relationship. Therefore, the reflection of literature and art as a literary theory and practice of science and art is a kind of aesthetic experience of rational cognition and perceptual practice of the social existence of the historic and localized discipline. Fundamentally speaking, the rational presentation of aesthetic experience and historic condensation, inheritance and deepening are the study of the social ideology of aesthetic existence with historical functions. In the social construction of knowledge field, intellectuals present the aesthetic beauty of history (time) in the cultural change of space with the intelligence activities interwoven with diachronic and synchronicity.