论文部分内容阅读
总的说来,有关世界主义的探讨基于共同体已经存在或仍待实现的假定。这种假定的一个共同点是共同体代表包容“我们”并排斥“他者”的界限。相应地,将手伸向“他者”的纷争构成对宇宙——秩序的寻求,其实现是世界主义。这样,世界主义以倾向于综合的对立存在论为基础。这里辩护的主题是,作为一个联结点,而不是作为排斥“他者”的一个环节,界限存在论既是对“我们”必然的重新肯定,又是对“我们”的补充。这种存在论得到我们地球上民族和文化间的多方会谈的支持,是超越世界主义以及构建一个全球范围的人类共同体的手段。
In general, discussions on cosmopolitanism are based on the assumption that the community has existed or is yet to be realized. One thing in common with this assumption is the community’s tolerance of “us” and the exclusion of “the other”. Correspondingly, the struggle to reach out to the “Other” constitutes the search for a cosmic-order that is cosmopolitan. In this way, cosmopolitanism is based on a comprehensive theory of opposing existentialism. The theme of defense here is that as a connecting point, not as a link that excludes the “other”, Boundary Ontology is both a necessary reaffirmation of “us ” and a supplement to “us ” . This kind of ontology is supported by the multi-ethnic talks between our peoples and cultures on this earth and is a means of transcending cosmopolitanism and building a worldwide human community.