论文部分内容阅读
笔者所在的拍卖公司曾于2004年11月的法院摇珠选定拍卖机构会上摇到了一宗标的,标的物为一套印刷厂的设备,评估价82万元。接受委托后我公司立即展开拍卖前的准备工作,登公告,找客户,但是因为设备的购置时间太长,而且主要部件已缺损,经过两次降价重拍仍未能成交,然后由市法院打报告给市中级法院,建议采取荷兰式拍卖。于是,法院定出保留价,要求拍卖公司以52万元作为起拍价再次公
The auction house in which the author was located was razed to a bid on the auction house of the court shaking ballot in November 2004, and the subject matter was a set of printing equipment, with an evaluation price of 820,000 yuan. After commissioned by the company immediately started the preparatory work before the auction, Deng announcement, looking for customers, but because of the equipment purchase time is too long, and the main components have been damaged, after two price remake has failed to deal, and then by the Municipal Court beat Report to the municipal intermediate court, it is recommended to take the Dutch auction. As a result, the court set a reserve price, requiring auction companies to 520,000 yuan as the starting price once again public