论文部分内容阅读
目的探究剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及临床效果。方法选取2014年6月至2016年6月在我院就诊的100例剖宫产术后再次妊娠的孕妇进行临床研究,其中将阴道分娩的50例产妇作为甲组,剖宫产分娩的作为乙组,观察比对两组产妇的住院时间、出血量及并发生等情况。结果剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩后,甲组产妇的住院时间、出血量及并发症发生率均显著低于乙组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论剖宫产术后再次妊娠不可作为剖宫产术的必要指征,要依据患者实际身体情况选择合适的分娩方式,可有助于缩短住院时间、降低术中出血量及并发症的发生率。
Objective To explore the choice of pregnancy mode of delivery after cesarean section and its clinical effect. Methods From June 2014 to June 2016 in our hospital, 100 cases of pregnancy after cesarean section pregnant women were selected for clinical study, of which 50 cases of vaginal delivery of women as Group A, cesarean section delivery as B Group, observed and compared two groups of maternal hospitalization time, bleeding and the occurrence of such circumstances. Results After cesarean delivery after pregnancy again, group A maternal hospitalization time, the amount of bleeding and complications were significantly lower than in group B, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Re-pregnancy after cesarean section can not be used as an indication of cesarean section, according to the actual physical condition of patients choose the appropriate mode of delivery may help to reduce hospitalization time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of complications .