论文部分内容阅读
在语言学中,摹状词极具趣味,这类词字面上包含意义,表示了某种事物,然而,它所指的事物却不一定在现实生活中存在。摹状词理论认为一个专名是否具有真值,它的意义都可以被一个或几个摹状词给出;克里普克则强调专名是通过某些与其有关的历史事实来指称某个特定个体的。而他们对于空名问题的解释并不使人信服。本文从凸显、词义映射、心理空间等角度对该问题进行探讨。一、空名问题概说语言学中的一个普遍观点是:一个
In linguistics, the description of the description is very interesting, such words literally contain meaning, which means something, however, it does not necessarily mean that it exists in real life. The fact that a proper name has the true value of a proper name can be given by the description word theory in the sense that its meaning can be given by one or several descriptions. Kripke emphasizes that a proper name refers to a certain historical fact by some related fact Specific individuals. And their explanation of the issue of empty names is not convincing. This article explores the issue from the perspectives of highlighting, semantic mapping and psychological space. First, an overview of empty names Linguistics is a common view: one