论文部分内容阅读
在《马克思主义创新杂志》第24号的出版前言中有这样的表述,随着社会问题的“复兴”和在资本主义大都市大规模贫困和贫困窘迫过程的加剧,在正式的讨论中就“新的下层阶级”这个题目而进行的有关阶级的讨论,重新受到学术界的重视,成为人们关注的热点。自1989年以来,从阶级向人民这种精神上的反跳并没有持续多久——“社会对抗和不太令人高兴的这种精神倒退的结果”是十分明显的。 现在应该关心的,并非什么东西是否能够登上大雅之堂,值得学术界关注,而是这样的问题,即在社会中是不是重新出现了更强烈的阶级分化的发展趋势,抑或我们所面临的只是一种精神的倒退?在社会经济意义上被确定的阶级是否重又成为(或者始终仍然是)社会行为的真正主体?还有:这一点对左派的政策来讲会产生怎样的结果,这一切是否应该被限定为一种纯粹的学术讨论?
In the foreword of the publication of “Marxist Innovation Magazine” No. 24, there is such a statement. With the “revival” of social issues and the aggravation of the massive poverty and the embarrassment of poverty in the capitalist metropolis, formal discussions on “ New class under the theme of ”the subject of the class discussions, re-receive the attention of academics, become the focus of attention. Since 1989, the spiritual rebound from class to people has not continued for a long time - the result of such a retrogression of social antagonism and less than happy is obvious. What should now be weighed down is not something that can be boarded up to the outside world. It deserves the attention of academics. Instead, it is the question whether the trend of stronger class differentiation has re-emerged in society or whether we are facing Is it just a spiritual retrogression? Are sociopolitical determinants of classes once again (or always) the true subject of social conduct? And what impact will this have on the leftist policy? Should everything be limited to a purely academic discussion?