论文部分内容阅读
同仁堂选择赵炳贤,是一场激烈竞争的结果。1999年上半年,在国内主板市场上市已两年的同仁堂股份有限公司确定了在香港上市的战略方针,并开始寻找财务顾问研究设计上市方案。中证万融、中银国际亚洲有限公司、法国里昂证券以及百富勤等几家财务顾问公司向同仁堂提出了三种上市方案。在1999年5月～11月半年时间里,同仁堂股份公司深入研究、比较、修订这三种上市方案。11月,中证万融以表格的方式对三种方案的利弊进行了深入的比较。最后同仁堂采纳了中证万融的“创业板方案”。该方案主张,在 A 股公司下成立一家科技公司,再将科技公司
Tong Ren Tang Zhao Bingxian choice, is a result of fierce competition. In the first half of 1999, Tong Ren Tang Co., Ltd., which has been listed on the domestic mainboard market for two years, set a strategic guideline of listing in Hong Kong and began to look for financial advisors to study and design the listing plan. Several financial advisers, including China Vanke, BOCI Asia Limited, CLSA and Peregrine, have proposed three listing options to Tong Ren Tang. During the six months from May to November 1999, Tong Ren Tang Joint Stock Company thoroughly studied, compared and revised the three listing plans. In November, the China Securities Vancomycin conducted an in-depth comparison of the pros and cons of the three schemes in tabular form. Tong Ren Tang finally adopted the “Vanke GEM card program.” The program claims that A-share companies set up a technology company, and then technology companies