论文部分内容阅读
学校中存在学习后进、品行不良的学生,是不足为怪的。改变他们,使之成为品学兼优的学生,是教育工作者的责任。目前普遍有“差生”、“双差生”的提法,我们认为不妥。因为这种提法缺乏辩证的观点,把学生整个地否定了,而且有伤学生的自尊心。我们认为,提学生的问题行为要恰当些。所谓“差”,不过是学生某些方面存在一些需要解决的问题罢了,解决了问题行为,学生就会好起来。这种提法有助于我们去研究问题行为本身,不至于因“差”或“双差”这样笼统的概
It is not at all surprising that there are students in schools that learn later and who behave badly. It is the educator’s responsibility to change them and make them good students. At present, there are commonly referred to as “poor students” and “double poor students.” We think it inappropriate. Because this formulation lacks a dialectical perspective, denying the student as a whole and hurting the student’s self-esteem. In our opinion, it is appropriate to mention the students’ problems. The so-called “bad”, but there are some aspects of students there are some problems need to be solved, solve the problem behavior, students will be better. This formulation helps us to study the problem behavior itself, not because of “poor” or “double difference” such a general