论文部分内容阅读
《湖南档案》今年第三期,刊载了李培清同志写的《关于国家全部档案分类的探讨》一文。文中谈到了“国家全部档案”划分为七大类的优点:“此种分类方法,既适用于‘宏观’档案,即‘国家全部档案’的分类,又适用于‘微观’档案,即‘一个全宗内档案’的分类……”我认为,李培清同志提出的分类方案,对“国家全部档案”的分类是可行的,而对“一个全宗内档案”的分类是不适应的。一、“国家全部档案”分类,是指全国各类档案馆的所有全宗档案分类,而“全宗内档案”的分类,则是将一个全宗内的档案分类,二者分类的对象不同。前者是众多的不同种类和形式的档案,后者则是相对少量的并具有某项工作性质的档案,二者在“质”和“量”上
The third issue of this year’s “Hunan Archives” contains a paper entitled “Discussion on Classification of All Archives in the Country” written by Comrade Li Peiqing. The article mentions the advantages of dividing the “national archives” into seven major categories: “This classification method applies to both ’macroscopic’ archives, that is, the classification of ’national archives’ and to the ’micro’ archives, ie, Fonds ’archives’ ... ”I think that the classification scheme proposed by Comrade Li Peiqing is feasible for the classification of“ all archives of the country, ”while the classification of“ one Fonds archives ”is not applicable. I. Classification of “All Files in the Country” refers to the classification of all the Fonds files of all kinds of archives in the country. The classification of “Files in the Fonds” is based on the classification of files within a Fonds, and the objects classified by the two are different . The former is a large number of different types and forms of archives, while the latter is a relatively small number of files with a certain nature of work, both in “quality” and “quantity”