论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析C反应蛋白(CRP)和血常规的测定结果,探讨两者联合检测的临床意义。方法收集在本院诊疗的80例感染性患者为感染组,80例健康体检者为对照组,分别检测CRP、血常规。结果感染组白细胞(WBC)正常例数及CRP、WBC、中性粒细胞百分比(N%)升高例数与对照组比较(P<0.01)。在感染组中,CRP与WBC同时升高的占60.0%,CRP升高WBC正常的占35.0%;CRP正常WBC升高的占1.3%,CRP、WBC都正常的占3.7%。结论感染时CRP检测优于血常规,2者联合检测可提高感染性疾病诊断的准确率。
Objective To compare and analyze the results of C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood routine test, and to explore the clinical significance of the combined detection of both. Methods Totally 80 infective patients collected in our hospital were infected, and 80 healthy controls were used as control group to detect CRP and blood routine respectively. Results The number of normal white blood cells (WBC) and CRP, WBC and neutrophil percentage (N%) in infected group were significantly higher than those in control group (P <0.01). In the infected group, CRP and WBC simultaneously increased 60.0%, CRP increased WBC normal 35.0%; CRP normal WBC increased 1.3%, CRP, WBC normal 3.7%. Conclusion CRP detection is superior to blood routine when infected. The combined detection of two can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of infectious diseases.