论文部分内容阅读
本文通过综述和分析二语口语测试和评估中口语语篇区别性特征研究,发现该领域存在4方面问题:1)口语能力定义模糊且过于宽泛,导致口语区别性特征研究缺乏统一的理论框架;2)口语能力同一维度中,口语语篇区别性特征指标标注缺乏理论指导,指标选取随意性较强;3)同一区别性特征定义以及测量方式不尽相同,导致不同研究无法比较;4)选用的区别性特征缺乏效度验证。在讨论了口语语篇区别性特征研究的最新发展趋势后,本文指出今后我国口语语篇区别性特征研究要从3个方面予以加强。
In this paper, we summarize and analyze the distinctive features of oral discourse in second language testing and assessment. We find there are four aspects in this field: 1) The definition of colloquial ability is ambiguous and too broad, resulting in a lack of a unified theoretical framework for the study of colloquial distinctions; 2) In the same dimension of oral ability, there is no theoretical guidance for distinguishing distinctive features in spoken discourse, and indicators are more arbitrary; 3) The same distinctive features are defined and measured differently, leading to incomparable studies; 4) The distinctive features lack verification of validity. After discussing the latest development trend of the research on the distinctive features of oral discourse, this paper points out that the study on the distinctive features of spoken discourse in our country should be strengthened from three aspects.