论文部分内容阅读
Aim: To evaluate the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) in paediatric glaucoma treatment. Methods: In a retrospective non-comparative case series 55 eyes of 40 consecutive paediatric patients (≤ 16 years) with primary or secondary glaucoma underwent Baerveldt (350 mm2) implantation. Surgical out come was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier table analysis. Results: The overall success rate was 80% at last follow up, with a mean follow up of 32 (range 2- 78) months. Cumulative success was 94% at 12 months and 24 months, 85% at 36 months, 78% at 48 months, and 44% at 60 months. 11 eyes (20% )-failed postoperatively because of an IOP > 21 mm Hg (eight eyes), persistent hypotony (two eyes), and choroidal haemorrhage following cataract surgery (one eye). The most frequent complication needing surgery was tube related (20% ). A new observation was mild to moderate dyscoria in 22% of the eyes, all buphthalmic, caused by entrapment of a tuft of peripheral iris in the tube track. Conclusions: The BGI is effective and safe in the management of primary and secondary glaucoma. When angle surgery has proved to be unsuccessful or inappropriate in paediatric patients, a BGI is a good treatment option. One must be prepared to deal with the tube related problems.
Aim: To evaluate the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) in pediatric glaucoma treatment. Methods: In a retrospective non-comparative case series 55 eyes of 40 consecutive pediatric patients (≤ 16 years) with primary or secondary glaucoma underwent Baerveldt (350 mm2) implantation Results: The overall success rate was 80% at last follow up, with a mean follow up of 32 (range 2- 78) months. Cumulative success was 94% at 12 months eyes (20%) -failed postoperatively because of IOP> 21 mm Hg (eight eyes), persistent hypotony (two eyes ), and choroidal haemorrhage following cataract surgery (one eye). The most frequent complication for surgery was tube related (20%). A new observation was mild to moderate dyscoria in 22% of the eyes, all buphthalmic, caused by entrapment of a tuft of peripheral iris in the tube track. Conclusions: The BGI is e ffective and safe in the management of primary and secondary glaucoma. When angle surgery has proved to be unsuccessful or inappropriate in pediatric patients, a BGI is a good treatment option. One must be prepared to deal with the tube related problems.