论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨LAVH手术的临床应用优势。方法:对58例LAVH手术及随机52例TAH手术进行对比分析。结果:LAVH手术在术中估计出血量、术后3 d最高体温、肛门排气时间、平均住院日明显优于TAH组,LAVH手术平均手术时间略长于TAH组。结论:如果LAVH适应证选择得当,可作为妇科良性病变子宫切除术首选方法。
Objective: To investigate the clinical advantages of LAVH surgery. Methods: 58 cases of LAVH surgery and randomized 52 cases of TAH surgery were analyzed. Results: The intraoperative blood loss was estimated by LAVH surgery. The maximum body temperature, anal exhaust time and average length of stay at 3 days after operation were significantly better than those of TAH group. The mean operative time of LAVH operation was slightly longer than that of TAH group. Conclusion: If LAVH indications properly selected, can be used as the preferred method of hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.