论文部分内容阅读
李泽厚先生不赞成牟宗三判定朱子为旁出,提出了一种新的旁出说,认为孟子、阳明才是真正的“别子为宗”。这一观点贬低乃至否定以孟子、阳明为代表的心学一系,未能照顾到儒学发展的整体脉络,同样是一偏,与牟宗三殊途同归,只是方向相反而已。究其根由仍然是两分法这一思维方式所致。
Mr. Li Zehou disapproved of Mou Zongsan’s decision that Zhu Zhai should go aside, proposing a new aside and saying that Mencius and Yangming were real “non-son”. This viewpoint derogates and even negates the series of psychology represented by Mencius and Yangming and fails to take care of the whole context of the development of Confucianism. It is also one-sided and the same as Mou Zongsan’s different ends, only in the opposite direction. The root cause is still dichotomy of this way of thinking.