论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查当前地方性高校学生的焦虑心理现状,分析焦虑的影响因素,同时探讨其与应付方式的关系,以提高其身心健康水平。方法:对181名在校大学生采用随机抽样的方法,运用应付方式问卷和烦恼心理问卷进行测量。结果:1学生焦虑状况整体处于“轻微”到“中等程度”之间;2“缺乏自信”焦虑因子上,班委显著低于非班委人员(F=4.847,P=0.029);无睡眠困扰者焦虑水平最低(P<0.05);学习成绩处于及格水平附近者的焦虑水平最高(P<0.05);3焦虑各因子与应对方式相关显著(P<0.05),解决问题和幻想解释了“前途迷茫”变异程度的18.4%(R2=0.184);自责、解决问题和退避解释“缺乏自信”变异程度的23.1%(R2=0.231);解决问题和退避解释“经济压力”变异程度的10.3%(R2=0.103)。结论:地方高校学生焦虑程度适中,心理状况良好;焦虑的积极应对与消极应对方式并存,来自“前途迷茫”的焦虑主要采用解决问题和幻想的应付方式,“缺乏自信”采用自责、解决问题和退避,“经济压力”采用解决问题和退避的应付方式。
Objective: To investigate the current psychological status of students in local colleges and universities and to analyze the influencing factors of anxiety, and to explore the relationship with anxiety in order to improve their physical and mental health. Methods: 181 college students using random sampling method, using coping style questionnaire and annoyance questionnaire to measure. Results: 1 The overall anxiety status of students was between “mild” and “moderate”; 2 “lack of self-confidence ” anxiety factor, class committee was significantly lower than non-class officers (F = 4.847, P = (P <0.05); anxiety level was the highest (P <0.05); the anxiety level was the highest (P <0.05); the anxiety level was the highest (P <0.05) And fantasies explained 18.4% (R2 = 0.184) of degree of variation in “Conflict of Future ”; self-blame, problem-solving and evasive explanation “lack of self-confidence ” 23.1% (R2 = 0.231) Explain 10.3% of the “economic pressure” variation (R2 = 0.103). Conclusion: The local college students have moderate anxiety and good psychological status. The positive coping and negative coping styles of anxiety coexist. The anxiety from “confusion” mainly adopts coping style to solve problems and fantasies, and “lack of self-confidence” Responsibility, problem solving and retreat, “economic pressure ” to adopt to solve the problem and retreat to deal with.