论文部分内容阅读
越智重明曾提出不应过高评价魏晋南北朝的贵族制,因为据此恐怕很难搞清楚皇帝权力的本质。对此,谷川道雄批评说,若按照越智的意见,就无法究明六朝贵族制的特质。其后,日本的贵族制研究变得极其精致,另一方面,越智所说的皇帝权力问题相较贵族制研究却还有很多问题没有解决。这种情况是否仍在延续呢?笔者手头搜集的2010年魏晋南北朝史方面的论文有130篇,通观这些论文可看出如下倾向:(一)继承、发展以往关于贵族以及对其控制方面的研究;(二)分析与政治、制度有关的事实和现象,从中探求这一时代王权、国家的特质;
The more wisely we have proposed that we should not overestimate the aristocracy in the Wei, Jin, and Southern and Northern Dynasties, for which it would be very difficult to find out the essence of the power of the emperor. In response, Tadashi Taniguchi criticized that if we follow the intellectual advice, we will not be able to tell the traits of the nobles in the Six Dynasties. Later, Japan's study of aristocracy became extremely delicate. On the other hand, there were still many problems unsolved in the study of imperial power by the intellectual. Whether this situation is still continuing? The author collected 130 papers in the history of the Wei, Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties in 2010, through these papers we can see the following tendencies: (a) inherit and develop the previous aristocracy and its control Research; (2) to analyze the facts and phenomena related to politics and system, and to seek the monarchy of this era and the characteristics of the country;