论文部分内容阅读
对冤假错案的处理,映射出在当前的法制环境中,司法制度对人权的尊重与保护,反映司法机关的公信力。截止2016年,连续三年最高人民法院及最高人民检察院均将冤错案件处理情况写入全国人大期间公布的工作报告,这一举动反映出最高人民法院和最高人民检察院对冤假错案的高度重视,彰显了司法机关推动司法公正、坚实司法公信力的决心。2016年,“海南陈满案”得以再审,并最终判决陈满无罪正是我国司法制度进步的体现。本文从侦查取证和审判程序的角度,分析“海南陈满案”中在证据认证过程中的不合理做法,从而进一步规范我国侦查机关依法取证行为,逐步形成以审判为中心的诉讼制度。
The handling of unjustly false cases reflects the judicial system’s respect for and protection of human rights in the current legal environment, reflecting the credibility of the judiciary. As of 2016, both the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate have written the handling of grievances and wrongs cases into the work report promulgated by the NPC for three consecutive years, a move that reflects that the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate have attached great importance to unjustly wrongful and wrong cases , Highlighting the determination of the judiciary to promote judicial fairness and consolidate the credibility of the judiciary. In 2016, “Hainan Chen Man Case ” was retrial, and ultimately the indictment of Chen Man is the embodiment of the progress of our judicial system. This article analyzes the unreasonable practices in the process of evidence verification in “Hainan Chen Man Case” from the perspective of investigative forensics and trial procedure, so as to further standardize the act of obtaining evidence according to law by our investigation organ and gradually form the litigation system centered on trial.