论文部分内容阅读
前两年我读过两本书,一是杜经国等写的《历史学概论》,一是陆学艺等主编的《社会学》,发现二书关于社会结构范畴的见解截然不同。前者缺少社会结构范畴,批判“力图把自然科学中产生的系统论、控制论搬用到社会历史科学中”的做法;后者则认为:“社会结构一直是社会学研究的核心问题”,并且“从理论上说,它既是社会静态分析的终点,也是社会动态分析的起点。”这一明显的差别,曾引起过我的诧异。二者的差别表明什么,是不言而喻的。最近很高兴地读到了史学同仁关
I read two books in the first two years. One is “Introduction to History” written by Du Jingguo et al. The other is “Sociology” edited by Lu Xueyi et al. And found that the two books have very different opinions on the social structure category. The former lacks the category of social structure and criticizes the practice of “trying to transfer the system theory and cybernetics generated in natural science into the social and historical sciences”; the latter argues that “social structure has always been the core issue of sociological research” and “ In theory, it is not only the end of social static analysis, but also the starting point of social dynamic analysis. ”This obvious difference has aroused my surprise. It goes without saying that the difference between the two shows. Recently I was very happy to read my collegiate history