论文部分内容阅读
理论与实践关系的难题并非天然存在,而是被某种“哲学”所造成的。西方哲学以有别于日常劳碌的神性之“看”宣告自己的诞生,宣告了智慧之爱的“理论”性,同时也宣告了哲学与实践的对立。西方哲学是“看”的隐喻化及其系统化,其典范是柏拉图的“相”论。评论这类哲学的隐喻根据及其与实践的对立,可从另类与实践并无紧张关系的哲学性隐喻即“道”论出发,使“相”论与实践的张力昭然若揭。理论既已疏离于实践,就再难回过头来统驭实践,因此“实践‘哲学’”之难便在于它不是毁坏实践,就是毁坏哲学。
The problem of the relationship between theory and practice does not exist naturally, but is caused by some kind of “philosophy”. Western philosophy declares its birth by announcing its birth by distinguishing itself from the everyday labor of divine nature, declaring the “theoretical” nature of the love of wisdom, and at the same time declaring the opposition between philosophy and practice. Western philosophy is the metaphoricalization and systematization of “Look ”, the paradigm of which is Plato’s “phase ” theory. Commenting on the metaphorical basis of such philosophies and their contradictions with practice, we can proceed from the philosophical metaphor, ie, “Taoism”, that has no tension with other species and practice, so that the tension between “phase” theory and practice can be clearly revealed . Since the theory has been estranged from practice, it is hard to go back and control practice. Therefore, the difficulty of “practicing philosophy” lies in that it does not destroy practice or destroy philosophy.