论文部分内容阅读
人民政协的宪法化,并不单纯指人民政协的入宪,而是指人民政协的职权、组织构成、活动方式、基本工作原则等,在我国宪法中的体现状态、表述程度及变迁的完整过程。为给人民政协宪法化问题研究寻找比较法方面的证据和素材,本文对175部外国现行宪法文本进行了比较分析。结果显示,有86.3%都规定了除立法、司法、行政等机关之外的特设机构,且已成为新制定宪法的一种普遍趋势。而在对与人民政协类似的国外协商咨询机构的宪法化程度进行深入分析后也发现,大多数国外宪法文本中关于协商咨询机构的规定,都不是放在序言中,且多以单设条文、章节的形式加以体现,在内容上也涵盖了其性质、职权、组成、产生方式等诸多方面。这显然与人民政协在我国宪法文本中单薄的表述大不相同。与人民政协类似的国外协商咨询机构这种普遍较高的宪法化程度,为人民政协的宪法化问题研究提供了多方面的启示。
The CPPCC’s constitutionalization does not mean simply referring to the CPPCC’s entry into the Constitution, but refers to the complete process of manifesting, expressing and changing the CPPCC’s authority, organization, activities and basic working principles in our country’s constitution . In order to find evidence and material for the comparative study on the constitutionalization of CPPCC, this article makes a comparative analysis of 175 foreign constitutional texts. The results showed that 86.3% of them provided for special bodies other than the legislature, the judiciary and the administration, and they have become a general trend of the new constitution. After an in-depth analysis of the constitutionalization of foreign consultative and advisory bodies similar to the CPPCC, it was found that most of the provisions in the foreign constitutional texts on consultative consultation agencies are not placed in the Preamble, Chapter form to be reflected in the content also covers its nature, authority, composition, production and many other aspects. This is obviously quite different from the weaker statement made by the CPPCC in our constitutional texts. This generally higher level of constitutionalization, similar to that of the CPPCC, provides many implications for the CPPCC constitutionalization study.