论文部分内容阅读
古今中外的国家治理腐败大都重视刚性、覆盖有限的硬法,忽视柔性、覆盖面广的软法,结果未达致腐败治理的预期目标。软法治理腐败的论述鲜有被提及。这使腐败治理在实践中走入了歧路,理论上无法纵深发展。事实上,既然腐败由具有主观能动性的主体做出,那么对于腐败的治理就要在民主的语境下内外兼治、双管齐下,才能达致理想的效果。软法的衍生发展为腐败治理提供民主的情境使人们心悦诚服、不愿腐;软法的自律秉性肇致人们自我约束、不去腐;软法数量众多、纵横交错、涉及领域广阔使人们不能腐。我们强调软法循循善诱、治理腐败的长期杰出功效,并不冷落硬法的作用。只有软法与硬法的有机结合,才能从根本上治理腐败。
Most of the corruption in our country at all times and in all countries emphasizes rigidity, limited hard law, ignores the flexible and extensive soft law, and the result does not achieve the expected goal of corruption. The discussion of corruption in soft law has rarely been mentioned. This makes corrupt governance go astray in practice and can not theoretically develop in depth. In fact, since corruption is made by subjective and motivated actors, the governance of corruption must be managed both inside and outside the democratic context in order to achieve the desired result. The Derivation of Soft Law Provides Democracy for Corruption Governance, Enjoying Hospitality and Reluctance to Corrupt; The Self-discipline of Soft Law Causes Self-restraint and Non-Corruption; The Law of Soft Law Is Large in Number, . We emphasize that the long-term outstanding effect of soft law and persuasion and the control of corruption do not neglect the role of hard law. Only the organic combination of soft law and hard law can fundamentally govern corruption.